3 ms·
But the // is useful. http://stackoverflow.com/a/2216721 http://stackoverflow.com/a/2216721
by Shorel 12y ago
But the // is useful.
http://stackoverflow.com/a/2216721 http://stackoverflow.com/a/2216721
- MrBuddyCasino 12y agoYes thats a good point, protocol-relative links are useful, but IMHO they don't necessarily depend on the "//". If URLs would look like "http:google.com/bla", a different syntax would have been invented instead, e.g. ":google.com/bla".