It's a good first step, however unless the experiments are repeatable/independent, it's not particularly trustworthy. Consider that they may be falsifying or m

It's a good first step, however unless the experiments are repeatable/independent, it's not particularly trustworthy. Consider that they may be falsifying or misinterpreting data. The only way to be sure they aren't -- or pretty sure, anyway -- is to have independent researchers be able to follow the same repeatable process in order to replicate the results. I don't know enough about this case to say whether they have a good repeatable experimental process -- it's possible that the website just smells so strongly of woo that nobody has even tried to replicate their results in the first place. But without that independent verification, the proposed results seem questionable.