3 ms·
The internet has proven to be quite resilient. So there's not much to be changed. I can think of: * More security baked in by default. * Quicker implementatio
by anilgulecha 12y ago
The internet has proven to be quite resilient. So there's not much to be changed. I can think of:
* More security baked in by default.
* Quicker implementation and standardization of features the market demands -- so Java, Flash and ActiveX could be avoided.
* Lesser reliance on central nodes (nameservers, etc), with a larger emphasis on a network of peers, which dynamically grows with actual need.
* Oh and somehow fix domain system. I don't think there's any value that domain squatters provide to the network that don't have simpler alternatives.
- egeozcan 12y agoHonest question on your last point: What would you offer to prevent the somewhat dark-market forming around the limited number of meaningful identifiers? Using non-meaningful identifiers worked with phone numbers when they were bound to a region, but the web is global so I suppose you would not be happy with something like newprotocol://europe.germany.berlin.101010.servicename ?
- uaygsfdbzf 12y agoI would use the GNUnet name system: https://gnunet.org/gns-implementation https://gnunet.org/gns-implementation