> But look at the feature photo in that story, which constitutes most of the "tip" from the tweet. I'm late so I doubt you'll see this, but I don't understand

> But look at the feature photo in that story, which constitutes most of the "tip" from the tweet. I'm late so I doubt you'll see this, but I don't understand what you're saying here. The Al Arabiya feature photo clearly states it's an AFP file photo. There are no references to a tweet, and certainly no direct claims that it's an actual photo of the executed man, or that it's their "source" for claims that ISIS crucified someone. Maybe they are giving too strong of false implications about the photo, but I don't follow your jump to "made up out of thin air" just because a file photo was used for illustration. I could agree the story sounds shaky, but not based on the evidence you gave here.