4 ms·

Great post by Jonathan. For the case of a big 'single page' JS app where a most of the rendering happens from Javascript fetched on the page, I'd guess this app

Great post by Jonathan. For the case of a big 'single page' JS app where a most of the rendering happens from Javascript fetched on the page, I'd guess this approach won't help that much since you have to fetch the JS from the CDN/cookieless domain anyways. Still though, definitely worth an experiment to know for sure.

morgante 12y ago
> For the case of a big 'single page' JS app where a most of the rendering happens from Javascript fetched on the page, I'd guess this approach won't help that much since you have to fetch the JS from the CDN/cookieless domain anyways. If you're taking that approach, you probably don't care much about performance anyways (I've never seen a pure JS SPA which rendered fast).
- colanderman 12y ago
  FastMail begs to differ: http://blog.fastmail.com/2014/12/15/dec-15-putting-the-fast-in-fastmail-loading-your-mailbox-quickly/ http://blog.fastmail.com/2014/12/15/dec-15-putting-the-fast-... Loads & renders in between 0.5-1.0s. (Though I must say FastMail is rather unique in this regard.)
  - kuschku 12y ago
    Reminds me of the time, 2 or 3 years ago, when Google announced that every page which would take more than 300ms to load and render would be downranked in the search. Seems like we’re going backwards...
- thekingshorses 12y ago
  try http://hn.premii.com/ http://hn.premii.com/ - Even though it relies on 3rd party for data (backend), it loads quickly. If you have a control over backend, you can optimize it further.