3 ms·

So, nothing to back that claim. No data or announcement from Facebook. Just a remark about external web links being shit on mobile and that's it. Not even a dec

by eknkc 12y ago

So, nothing to back that claim. No data or announcement from Facebook. Just a remark about external web links being shit on mobile and that's it. Not even a decent argument there. It's like saying elephants will grow tall necks in 2005 because of some random reason. Am I missing something here?

seanv 12y ago
that was my thinking... if he calls it right, he can point back to this article. If he called it wrong, no one will probably remember this post.
- markveronda 12y ago
  Interestingly, it's part of a broader query posed to many journalist and neatly compiled here: http://www.niemanlab.org/collection/predictions-2015/ http://www.niemanlab.org/collection/predictions-2015/ EVEN better, they follow a sane URL-naming scheme so last year's predictions were easy enough to find: http://www.niemanlab.org/collection/predictions-2014/ http://www.niemanlab.org/collection/predictions-2014/
mtmail 12y ago
The author is a finance blogger at Reuters (http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/ http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/) and they asked for a 2015 prediction. You're right, I don't see anything to back up the prediction.
- dennisnedry 12y ago
  Maybe the author is hoping this article will go viral on Facebook? It certainly has a bit of a link-baity headline.
- markveronda 12y ago
  Felix Salmon is no longer at Reuters. The article itself and the link both show as much.
balls187 12y ago
> Am I missing something here? Yes. Facebook announced updates to their Newsfeed algorithm to reduce the amount of "promotional" content people see in their feeds. https://www.facebook.com/business/news/update-to-facebook-news-feed https://www.facebook.com/business/news/update-to-facebook-ne...
- wmf 12y ago
  But the article is talking about Facebook limiting non-promotional Web links. It might be a reasonable thing for Facebook to do, but it's not obvious that they will.

by eknkc 12y ago

seanv 12y ago

that was my thinking... if he calls it right, he can point back to this article. If he called it wrong, no one will probably remember this post.

markveronda 12y ago
Interestingly, it's part of a broader query posed to many journalist and neatly compiled here: http://www.niemanlab.org/collection/predictions-2015/ http://www.niemanlab.org/collection/predictions-2015/ EVEN better, they follow a sane URL-naming scheme so last year's predictions were easy enough to find: http://www.niemanlab.org/collection/predictions-2014/ http://www.niemanlab.org/collection/predictions-2014/

mtmail 12y ago

The author is a finance blogger at Reuters (http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/ http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/) and they asked for a 2015 prediction. You're right, I don't see anything to back up the prediction.

dennisnedry 12y ago
Maybe the author is hoping this article will go viral on Facebook? It certainly has a bit of a link-baity headline.
markveronda 12y ago
Felix Salmon is no longer at Reuters. The article itself and the link both show as much.

balls187 12y ago

> Am I missing something here? Yes. Facebook announced updates to their Newsfeed algorithm to reduce the amount of "promotional" content people see in their feeds. https://www.facebook.com/business/news/update-to-facebook-news-feed https://www.facebook.com/business/news/update-to-facebook-ne...

wmf 12y ago
But the article is talking about Facebook limiting non-promotional Web links. It might be a reasonable thing for Facebook to do, but it's not obvious that they will.