4 ms·
On the one hand - you are right that the hourly figure is high. It just wont be THAT high. For example 20 mins per showing assumes they teleported to the apart
by bbcbasic 12y ago
On the one hand - you are right that the hourly figure is high. It just wont be THAT high.
For example 20 mins per showing assumes they teleported to the apartment, right?
You didn't include all of the fixed costs, like the broker's rent, staff, insurances, cars etc. You didn't include the time spent haggling with the property owners.
So lets assume the pay is lower but still high - say $200 an hour. That is still alot. Why aren't people advertising on craiglist themselves.
On to my second point:
I don't live in the US. Buy my wife sold her apartment herself without an agent (broker) for a good price. She tried an agent first but they were not interested in putting in that much effort. So I agree that these overpaid agents are not always needed.
So why do we need brokers/agents in 2014 when most of the work is marketing, which the internet takes care of (and isn't a lot of work)?
Premium properties and fixer-uppers excepted!
- rabbimarshak 12y agoYou make some good points. Many agents work a specific neighborhood, and lets also remember that open houses are typically on weekends and showings are clustered together. Sure, the broker has some basic expenses, but there is really no cost of the good sold. A store owner pays the same fees, and also pays for cost of a good. Exactly the point where in the old days, pre-internet - brokers needed to pay for marketing- classifieds in newspapers, signage, etc. Now the cost to advertise a listing is $0.