3 ms·

Yikes! I'm still impressed by qmail's track record: http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-86/product_id-143/Dan-Bernstein-Qmail.html http://ww

• knieveltech 12y ago
  Just wait. Evidence suggests it is impossible to send mail without also providing remote code execution as a service.
• astrodust 12y ago
  As good as qmail is, the official release is so far behind the times it's ridiculous. The unofficial patches, made unofficial by a stubborn refusal on the part of the author to merge them in, have fixed most of these issues, but then what's the point of using qmail if you have to use the untrusted version? Sadly qmail is a lesson of how you can be correct and completely wrong at the same time. Imagine a completely secure operating system that only runs on 32-bit systems. Could you actually advocate using it in a serious production capacity?