This seems like a pretty bad decision. You don't have a constitutional right to be free from being photographed in public spaces. If someone wants to follow a

This seems like a pretty bad decision. You don't have a constitutional right to be free from being photographed in public spaces. If someone wants to follow a police car from a safe distance for weeks and videotape it to capture the civil rights infractions done by its officers; this is now an unconstitutional activity? The proper way to place a check on this power is for people to decide this is not a good way to spend its money rather than absurd judicial gymnastics.