3 ms·
This is encouraging. I've wondered for several years why Mars when you've got places like Venus as potentially more interesting locations. Doing long term atmos
by diltonm 12y ago
This is encouraging. I've wondered for several years why Mars when you've got places like Venus as potentially more interesting locations. Doing long term atmospheric existence there could teach us a lot about what we don't know about space travel and our ability to push ourselves. If I didn't have two bad discs and was 3 decades younger; I'd be asking where to sign up.
Edit: Reading further, "while the crewed version would be nearly 130 meters long, or twice the size of a Boeing 747.". NASA needs to get much bolder in their thinking. Two people isn't enough. You need at least the size of a submarine crew to make it work and that means an airship 5000 meters long.
Edit 2: "At this point, things get crazy.". Well, it wouldn't be worth it otherwise.
- delecti 12y agoObviously getting to the moon is step one. Getting to Venus and Mars are at least on a comparable level of difficulty, and Mars is much more like the moon than Venus is, so we're already used to getting around it. I think it's more a case of going with the devil you know, even if Venus might be better overall for various reasons.