3 ms·
But you see, that it is the government's job to provide education is a decision that has been made way in the past and it's way over our heads the reasons for i
by innguest 12y ago
But you see, that it is the government's job to provide education is a decision that has been made way in the past and it's way over our heads the reasons for it. We should just accept that it's better. You don't want kids to go without education, right? And if the government is not providing it then no one can provide it.
For instance, the private industry can't provide accessible education for the poor because everyone that works in the private industry only does it for money and profit, which are bad things. But people that work for the government do it out of the good in their hearts (they don't care about the cushy job and the benefits at all).
So because it's impossible to gather round a bunch of kids in front of a $20 blackboard on some public space and teach them some skills, we need to spend $5 Billion (I actually think that's not enough, it should be at least $6.2 Billion) to hire more librarians.
How can you not see that this is the true way?