4 ms·
They claim to have 406M unique visitors monthly. If that is the case, it isn't shocking to see them at #7, only surprising that a lot of people working and liv
by htaunay 12y ago
They claim to have 406M unique visitors monthly.
If that is the case, it isn't shocking to see them at #7, only surprising that a lot of people working and living with tech since forever never heard of them
- dmix 12y agoI'm guessing ComScore combine metrics from visitors across various sub-properties. Glam properties on Compete: Glam.com = ~700k https://siteanalytics.compete.com/glam.com/ https://siteanalytics.compete.com/glam.com/ Ning.com = ~2 million https://siteanalytics.compete.com/ning.com/ https://siteanalytics.compete.com/ning.com/ Foodie.com = ~307k https://siteanalytics.compete.com/foodie.com/ https://siteanalytics.compete.com/foodie.com/ etc So these rankings are not based on singular properties. It probably combines Glams other properties such as Brash, Bliss, Foodie, Tend, etc. They have tons. Which may be fair since Yahoo is a series of sub-properties, although the branding is more consistent than Glam.
- macNchz 12y agoOkay that makes sense...I figured that since they were showcasing Glam.com and Brash.com on their homepage, that those sites were a major part of their business, but from those numbers it looks like they're a tiny fraction of their whole network's traffic. I'd be interested in seeing a list of all of their properties.
- lurchpop 12y agoSo, 3M uniques? Still doesn't make sense even with the roll-up.
- strathmeyer 12y agoMore companies we've never heard of and that nobody uses? Still sounds like money laundering