3 ms·
One thing I'm still confused about: if the parents have literally excommunicated him/functionally (temporarily) disowned him, who's idea was the PR firm, and mo
by aroman 12y ago
One thing I'm still confused about: if the parents have literally excommunicated him/functionally (temporarily) disowned him, who's idea was the PR firm, and moreover, who is paying for it?
- pavel_lishin 12y agoI doubt he's literally disowned. This sounds like some hyperbole on his part, as well as theirs. Look at the quote: > So what did your parents think when they’re reading that you’ve got $72 million? > Mohammed Islam: Honestly, my dad wanted to disown me. My mom basically said she’d never talk to me. Their morals are that if I lie about it and don’t own up to it then they can no longer trust me. … They knew it was false and they basically wanted to kill me and I haven’t spoken to them since. He didn't say they haven't spoken to him; they didn't say they did disown him. I've had my parents angry at me, to the point where they've yelled and said "I could kill you!" - but they're not literally going to murder him, and they're probably not literally disowning him.
- aroman 12y agoI didn't mean to suggest they were literally disowning him — that's why i said "functionally" and "temporarily".
- awwstn 12y agoThey might be working for free as part of some sort of partnership. In the aftermath of this, a good PR firm would have no shortage of ideas for monetizing these kids' infamy. In fact, it's quite possible the NY Observer paid a pretty penny for this exclusive interview.
- imjk 12y agoA crisis PR firm would love the publicity from an event like this and many would be willing to take these clients pro bono (not that they did in this case).