Is this an end of the year cause to show what scientist are doing with grants? This month we have had so many "Breakthrough" Scientific articles that basically

Is this an end of the year cause to show what scientist are doing with grants? This month we have had so many "Breakthrough" Scientific articles that basically don't match up. We had super conductor that wasn't 0 Celsius for room temperature. That would be a game changer. This is focused light requiring active cooling and X and Y axis control. Graphene article that actually shows that the title wasn't true since we are still at the beginning of the graphene stages without much real world impact. We also had the carbon filters for use around the world that also is far from being practical or usable yet contrary to its title.