4 ms·
Calling the process of "accepting a SciGen-generated paper into a allegedly peer-reviewed journal" a "precision error" is a bit on the optimistic side. It impli
by onan_barbarian 12y ago
Calling the process of "accepting a SciGen-generated paper into a allegedly peer-reviewed journal" a "precision error" is a bit on the optimistic side. It implies that someone was making a decision after reading the content of the paper, as opposed to, well, just accepting everything in sight.
It doesn't take a "week off" to notice that a paper is gibberish, at the very least.
- userbinator 12y agoUnless the reviewer doesn't actually know anything at all about what he/she claims to. It wouldn't surprise me at all if most of the general public would be unable to distinguish a SciGen-generated paper from a real one.
- GFK_of_xmaspast 12y agoWhat is such a person doing reviewing for the IEEE.