5 ms·
"Research shows that even when news reports have been retracted, and we are aware of the retraction, our beliefs are largely based on the initial erroneous vers
by jayro 12y ago
"Research shows that even when news reports have been retracted, and we are aware of the retraction, our beliefs are largely based on the initial erroneous version of the story. This is particularly true when we are motivated to approve of the initial account." - http://mindhacks.com/2011/05/04/why-the-truth-will-out-but-doesnt-sink-in/ http://mindhacks.com/2011/05/04/why-the-truth-will-out-but-d...
Original Paper:
http://pss.sagepub.com/content/16/3/190 http://pss.sagepub.com/content/16/3/190
- mherdeg 12y agoI've always wanted a short name for this phenomenon, where a lie takes hold and never leaves no matter how thoroughly it is debunked. Maybe the 'swift boat effect'?
- aswanson 12y agoThis is what makes so many people getting "breaking" sensational headlines from partisan blogs so dangerous. It becomes calcified reality for the vast majority of people; most folk are not hygenic with their belief structures. I actively seek disconfirmation of my beliefs, but most people seek reinforcement only.
- jayro 12y agoYep! How facts backfire - Researchers discover a surprising threat to democracy: our brains "In a series of studies in 2005 and 2006, researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even stronger." http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/07/11/how_facts_backfire/?page=full http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/07/11/...
- aswanson 12y agoI've seen this anecdotally and it scares the shit out of me that it's been verified statistically. Thanks for sharing.
- DustinCalim 12y agoThis is the commitment and consistency effect. The extreme cases can be found in cults where followers cling tighter to their beliefs once exposed. A great example are the followers of Harold Camping, the Christian radio broadcaster who predicted the end of the world a few years ago, and kept re-predicting when it never came. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Camping http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Camping
- Gostport 12y agoBut to complete the Camping story, and validate your argument (you still believe only the original, not the recant); Camping stopped after 2 failed dates, re-read his source material, and stated that he no longer believed that anyone could predict the end of the world. (Source: Netflix documentary on Camping)
- philwelch 12y agoThis tends to happen to an exceptional degree when news has a strong emotional impact, which is of course what sensationalized headlines try to emphasize (whether out of partisanship or because emotionally charged information is more viral). People's belief systems about the relative threats of terrorism and pedophiles is thus distorted by the media because the amount of time they spend watching terrorist attacks or episodes of "To Catch A Predator" is massively disproportionate to the actual level of risk posed by those kinds of things, and so especially is the emotional impact of that media.