6 ms·
It's not justifiable to charge for this, IMO, and I imagine anyone savvy enough to consider purchasing a browser add-on will know this. I'd be willing to share
by practicalpants 12y ago
It's not justifiable to charge for this, IMO, and I imagine anyone savvy enough to consider purchasing a browser add-on will know this.
I'd be willing to share it if it were for free since the branding is not bad. Otherwise, I'm a tad annoyed something so simple is not free, especially given there are free alternates.
- zo1 12y agoAt least they didn't use a .io domain, that would have been even more ridiculous/cliche at this point. But that's just my opinion, and you have yours. Someone else might have a completely different opinion of being very keen on paying whatever it is this site charges. The most we can do is point out free/better alternatives (if there are any) and let people make an informed decision for themselves based on their personal wants/needs... And we mustn't get angered at them, no matter how much we view our opinion on the matter as being superior to theirs.