16 ms·
>Why would you assume it is random? Because it is? If I just say "here's how filling food is: calories * pi * r2", that doesn't give you a data set, it gives
by imanaccount247 12y ago
>Why would you assume it is random?
Because it is? If I just say "here's how filling food is: calories * pi * r2", that doesn't give you a data set, it gives you made up numbers.
- beagle3 12y agoSuit yourself. The "calorie count" is just as invented according to your definition -- if you are not familiar with how calories are measured, educate yourself (and if you believe it is science, then make sure you can answer the question "then how come gasoline (12kc/gr) or paper (a carbohydrate) are not human edible", and "when and how were atwater factors derived". If you can answer these things and believe anything in nutrition is not "invented science" by your definition, then we have differing definitions of what constitutes science. And if you believe (as I do) that all of this is entirely unscientific, but some of it is sort of useful - than what exactly are you arguing?