3 ms·
Dispappointing to see this post on hacker news. Most of the people getting angry at uber don't even understand how their system works. Some random guy shared a
by butwhy 12y ago
Dispappointing to see this post on hacker news. Most of the people getting angry at uber don't even understand how their system works.
Some random guy shared a screenshot of a 4x surge on uber black and now the media is saying "uber making $100 off fares in a hostage situation!". So silly.
- girvo 12y agoA lot of other industries have regulation in place to stop price gouging during emergencies, such as this one. I'm all for Uber raising prices at 1am on a Sunday morning, due to supply/demand -- that's fine! But during an emergency, people find it icky that a business would take "advantage" of it like that. I initally thought it was just an algorithm, which doesn't excuse it entirely but is more understandable, but from Uber's tweets it seems they were aware and OK with jacking prices up that high despite the fact they knew it was an emergency. tl;dr -- Taxis aren't going to jack prices up 4x in an emergency, because it's illegal, and that's a good thing. Uber made a misstep here, and I've in favour of Uber normally (and finding the media backlash against them lately fascinating). It's a good thing they've gone back and reversed their position, this is an emergency and peoples safety is more importantly than a multinational company's profits, according to society.
- Tarang 12y agoIt's a bit disappointing that you see it is OK through an understanding of the system. In a time of emergency, its just not right. Market pricing can be justifiable but not when the person may have no choice. It is taking advantage of people.