> Also xmonad beats icewm. Did you mean "dwm"? As a non-tiling WM, icewm is very different from dwm (mentioned in the article) and xmonad. Assuming you meant

> Also xmonad beats icewm. Did you mean "dwm"? As a non-tiling WM, icewm is very different from dwm (mentioned in the article) and xmonad. Assuming you meant dwm, I'd invite people looking into doing this to have a look at i3wm as well. It's what I'm using now, and is quite nice.