> A citation to what? When few are allowed to publish, I think you just exposed the root of this. You're thinking a citation has to be a scientific paper or s

> A citation to what? When few are allowed to publish, I think you just exposed the root of this. You're thinking a citation has to be a scientific paper or something equivalent. I'm saying that when you argue something, you should be willing to cite ordinary evidence, of which a scientific paper is just one kind. A photo would be a perfectly reasonable thing to cite as evidence.