4 ms·

>>Because they don't all use pcre. Duh?<< "Duh?" because you haven't looked at the code? http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/program.php?test=regexdn

by igouy 12y ago

>>Because they don't all use pcre. Duh?<< "Duh?" because you haven't looked at the code? http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/program.php?test=regexdna&lang=go&id=2 http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/program.php?tes... http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/program.php?test=regexdna&lang=go&id=7 http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/program.php?tes... >>Why on earth would the code change because of a new compiler release?<< New GHC releases (and libraries) have in the past provided new ways to write the code. >>what "better" do you want?<< Any "better" that 6 or 7 releases has provided.

imanaccount247 12y ago
>"Duh?" because you haven't looked at the code? Me: "Not all use pcre" You: "Two that use pcre" What on earth is that supposed to show? >Any "better" that 6 or 7 releases has provided. You have some weird ideas about haskell/ghc.
- igouy 12y ago
  >>What on earth is that supposed to show?<< Those two that both use pcre don't perform the same. >>You have some weird ideas about haskell/ghc.<< If I have, I got them from seeing programs being re-written when new stuff became available.
  - imanaccount247 12y ago
    You got them from seeing someone writing a faster version. The part where you thought it had anything to do with "new stuff" is entirely your own imagination