4 ms·

>What's your understanding that happens then? Read the link. >For most people, it stores it as fat and does nothing because most people eat enough carbs (quic

>What's your understanding that happens then? Read the link. >For most people, it stores it as fat and does nothing because most people eat enough carbs (quick burning source of energy) to never have to switch to fat burning. So insulin is a problem because of what then? And how is that different from what would happen if you replaced those carbs with fats? (Please don't actually answer with the keto nonsense, read the link and see that the answer is "nothing would change").

1stop 12y ago
> Read the link. Were you the author of that link? Because if not, then that is someone else's understanding, what is yours? You've yet to describe it. > Please don't actually answer with the keto nonsense? Are you actually denying ketosis[0] exists? Or are you claiming it isn't reached through carb-restriction[1]? I haven't quite understood you point (mostly because you haven't really made one), but it seems science disagrees with you :\ [0] http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=ketosis http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=ketosis <-- I'd say the academic community disagrees with you. [1] http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=ketogenic http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=ketogenic <-- Again, the academic community disagrees with you.
- imanaccount247 12y ago
  >Are you actually denying ketosis[0] exists? Or are you claiming it isn't reached through carb-restriction[1]? No. What is the purpose of ignoring what I posted and asking completely random non-sequitur questions? Are you actually denying pancakes exist? Or claiming they aren't made with flour?
  - 1stop 12y ago
    You so quickly ran out of actual knowledge that your discussion ran off a cliff. Come back when you've actually read a little bit about how the body works. I've given you plenty of scholar links to start at. Maybe just strike up a conversation with a diabetic, explain to them your theory on how insulin has no effect.

1stop 12y ago

> Read the link. Were you the author of that link? Because if not, then that is someone else's understanding, what is yours? You've yet to describe it. > Please don't actually answer with the keto nonsense? Are you actually denying ketosis[0] exists? Or are you claiming it isn't reached through carb-restriction[1]? I haven't quite understood you point (mostly because you haven't really made one), but it seems science disagrees with you :\ [0] http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=ketosis http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=ketosis <-- I'd say the academic community disagrees with you. [1] http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=ketogenic http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=ketogenic <-- Again, the academic community disagrees with you.

imanaccount247 12y ago
>Are you actually denying ketosis[0] exists? Or are you claiming it isn't reached through carb-restriction[1]? No. What is the purpose of ignoring what I posted and asking completely random non-sequitur questions? Are you actually denying pancakes exist? Or claiming they aren't made with flour?
- 1stop 12y ago
  You so quickly ran out of actual knowledge that your discussion ran off a cliff. Come back when you've actually read a little bit about how the body works. I've given you plenty of scholar links to start at. Maybe just strike up a conversation with a diabetic, explain to them your theory on how insulin has no effect.