8 ms·
> Women are just all round better. Or what was meant was that the outcome was overall better; the outcome of a more diverse set of people, with different set o
by Dewie 12y ago
> Women are just all round better.
Or what was meant was that the outcome was overall better; the outcome of a more diverse set of people, with different set of strengths and weaknesses etc. Maybe something that was implicit is that men in general bring other strengths to the table, but that was for whatever reason not mentioned (maybe because the article was about women in tech).
EDIT: flag killing that post is a bit harsh...
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- ps4fanboy 12y agoOf course it was flagged killed, if you present a dissenting opinion on this site instead of engaging in meaningful discussion the cultural kafka fascists just hide you away. It is very interesting because I believe that the genders are equal which means I dont believe this sexist assertion that women somehow bring different strengths to engineering.
- justinsteele 12y agoEqual in value does not imply equal in thought, experience, or skill. I think that is the major flaw in your argument and why you are misconstruing breaking down barriers for women as "sexist".
- ps4fanboy 12y agoI am all for breaking down barriers I just dont think it will result in better outcomes, because different men have different thoughts, experiences and skills, it is just the nature of being human. To suggest though that somehow it will result in the things mentioned in the article is sexist because it attributes those qualities to a gender.
- sliverstorm 12y agoUnfortunately it's an ambiguous yet critical use of the word "more". More than before? Or more as in plurality?