3 ms·
PulseAudio gives me a better out-of-the-box experience than any other sound system, bar none.
by cbd1984 12y ago
PulseAudio gives me a better out-of-the-box experience than any other sound system, bar none.
- eots 12y agoGuess I'm the only one who had a cron job restarting the PulseAudio process regularly.
- bkeroack 12y ago# keep systemd happy 0 * * * * /bin/shutdown -r now
- digi_owl 12y agoYou know you are old when the first thing that comes to mind is a User Friendly strip... http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19990302 http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19990302
- amluto 12y agoI had to regularly restart PulseAudio to keep Firefox's context menu working :( On the one hand, PulseAudio really would have benefitted from a built-in watchdog to restart it its early days. On the other hand, before PulseAudio, I never really had working sound at all, so I consider PulseAudio to have been an improvement.
- Wilya 12y agoThat might be true today (I no longer have linux desktops, so I have no idea), but it took years of buggy (or extremely hard to configure) releases to reach that point.
- adestefan 12y agoWhich was the result of Ubuntu shipping buggy beta builds when everyone told them not to do it. So blame Ubuntu and not PulseAudio.
- Wilya 12y agoMy biggest problems were on Fedora, but it's not been really easy on Archlinux and Gentoo either...
- nieve 12y agoIt was a nightmare for me and several other local users on SuSE/openSUSE as well, so I think we're down to just Debian and Mandriva as major distros of that period that might not have had serious issues (Slackware was very conservative about integrating it). I suspect @adestefan used other distros minimally if at all and got lucky as far as PulseAudio went and I'm a bit envious. Problems with PA were a frequent topic in our LUG for 3-4 years and only a fraction of that was distro devs testing it early. Really they should have just used "PulseAudio: More powerful than OSS and more stable than Flash!" as the slogan.