3 ms·
IANAL, but: If they're operating, they have a common-law trademark even if not a formally-registered one. A same-named service of the same general functionalit
by gojomo 12y ago
IANAL, but:
If they're operating, they have a common-law trademark even if not a formally-registered one. A same-named service of the same general functionality would certainly cause consumer confusion, and possibly damage to their business, putting you at risk of a legitimate lawsuit. Legally and morally, they won the race to that name, so for trade purposes in that field of business, it's theirs.
If you love the idea, there's surely another good name. Perhaps after studying them, and noticing another area of differentiation, that can inspire another name.
You might be able to sell them your holdings, but don't expect much and the offer would have to be delivered very delicately so you don't seem like you're ransoming off properties they already have a strong claim to (and that in their mind, you might have acquired just to shake them down).
- koolba 12y agoI can't say I implemented much but I did design out what I'd like to build (in a dated notebook) and pitched the idea a bit to get feedback. I didn't acquire anything (domain, handles, etc) with the intent of a shakedown (nor is it on my mind at all). I can tell from the domain registration dates that they registered their alternative name after me. My immediate reaction to seeing the competitor was validation, "whoa somebody else had the same idea as me... I guess it's not terrible!" I do really like the name (it's fairly catchy). I think a part of my attachment to the idea comes from that. At the very least it the catchiness keeps it in my mind.