6 ms·
Mhm. My thoughts on this are aplit. On one hand having written assembly (x86) myself, I often find myself looking for ways to simplify development and what not.
by pmalynin 12y ago
Mhm. My thoughts on this are aplit. On one hand having written assembly (x86) myself, I often find myself looking for ways to simplify development and what not. However, on the other hand this defeats the purpose of assembly I think. Ideally you should only write small snippets in asm and leave the rest to C/C++. In fact by slapping enough features onto the macroassembler you'll pretty much get C, so the question is why won't I just you use C?
- PaulAJ 12y agoYou could use Haskell's type system to make it type safe. In fact Galois have done pretty much that in Ivory http://ivorylang.org/ http://ivorylang.org/