The implementation of their ideas can be found here: http://www.lib-res.org/ http://www.lib-res.org/. I have to say that I am essentially 100% in line with the

The implementation of their ideas can be found here: http://www.lib-res.org/ http://www.lib-res.org/. I have to say that I am essentially 100% in line with their views on how the peer review system should be structured. However, the site, for lack of better words, sucks. It is slow, buggy, and poorly designed. What researchers actually WANT is the simplicity of arxiv.org with a login feature and peer-reviewed commenting. Another group has another attempt here: https://publons.com https://publons.com. The website is much cleaner and better functioning, however, their idea is that peer-review may or may not be made public. It is mostly for people who want recognition for their peer review work. I wish they would just team up, implement the ideas of the first group with the coding and design talent of the second.