3 ms·
Anonymity is hard in practice when so much of science consist of small niche fields where it can be pretty obvious who the author of a paper is by just reading
by daemonk 12y ago
Anonymity is hard in practice when so much of science consist of small niche fields where it can be pretty obvious who the author of a paper is by just reading the content.
A better solution might be to enforce non-anonymous peer-reviews that can be read by the public after the paper has been published.
- tnhh 12y agoSome venues are doing this, e.g. f1000. Here's a paper that I reviewed: http://f1000research.com/articles/3-38/v2 http://f1000research.com/articles/3-38/v2