3 ms·
Basically, I agree with the dissatisfaction with JS-mandatory basic, informative pages. I'm sure this will cease to be useful at some point, but for the moment
by pasbesoin 12y ago
Basically, I agree with the dissatisfaction with JS-mandatory basic, informative pages.
I'm sure this will cease to be useful at some point, but for the moment, I find that some of the time, running the URL in question through Google Cache produces a useful view.
Of course, Google properties themselves increasingly insist upon JS, even for basic "read-only" views. At least I have some confidence that Google is performing some measure of vetting their own JS against particularly the security problems that most concern me.
Here's the OP URL, via Google Cache:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http%3A%2F%2Felm-lang.org%2Fblog%2Fannounce%2F0.14.elm http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http%3A...