3 ms·
I think only two of those pictures were actual photographs of the city; the rest were artists' depictions of the new city. Of the two photos, the first is from
by wtbob 12y ago
I think only two of those pictures were actual photographs of the city; the rest were artists' depictions of the new city. Of the two photos, the first is from a great distance, in winter, and could portray a pretty nasty-looking place covered in snow; the second is of wilderness on the outskirts (?) of town, again covered in snow.
No idea if Kiruna is actually a nasty-looking place or not, but it's possible.
- jpatokal 12y agoEverything looks nice when covered in snow or filmed from far enough away: https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=2018&bih=1157&q=kiruna&oq=kiruna&gs_l=img.3..0l10.887.2040.0.2659.8.7.0.0.0.0.231.805.0j3j1.4.0.msedr...0...1ac.1.60.img..4.4.801.U-GvVTRzVeg https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=2... But more realistically, here's downtown Kiruna today: https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiruna#mediaviewer/File:Kiruna_centrum.jpg https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiruna#mediaviewer/File:Kiruna...
- noselasd 12y agoYou can see for yourself in Google Maps; http://tinyurl.com/jvm8owu http://tinyurl.com/jvm8owu