4 ms·
ah gawdbless TheStranger (particularly prior to Dominic's curious departure) but the city is-not/will-not be on the hook for costs associated with the tunnel, o
by theophrastus 12y ago
ah gawdbless TheStranger (particularly prior to Dominic's curious departure) but the city is-not/will-not be on the hook for costs associated with the tunnel, overrun or otherwise. It's a state route (as a parallel part of state route 99), it's a state project, it was approved on the state level with only the most superficial approval of the city.
- hga 12y agoEvery source I've read about the project says the city is responsible for overruns. The author goes into the exact details of how this is so, even quoting language from the law and how it might be interpreted.
- theophrastus 12y agoNevertheless everything written down and filed with the city attorney respectfully belies Dominic and his faithful echo chamber on this particular issue.
- hga 12y agoRather obviously this is going to be subject to litigation, and you didn't have to tell me the above for me to know what the city's position will be ^_^!
- genwin 12y agoA $5 billion cost overrun is a decent possibility. That's about $20K for every worker in Seattle.