3 ms·
I'm pretty sure Elastic is on the right direction in this regard, don't you think?
by arthurcolle 12y ago
I'm pretty sure Elastic is on the right direction in this regard, don't you think?
- andrewhillman 12y agoI don't think so. I just went to their site and the first case study i opened was from theguardian.com. I went to theguardian.com and went to do a search. Guess who they are using to power their search function? Google. In my opinion which means nothing, sites need to figure out how to power their own search. Using a third party isn't going to work for most. Maybe people need to focus on building custom architecture that indexes the data in a more structured way rather than cobbling systems together that ultimately hinder search efforts when its time to get the user what they want. I don't know the answer but somebody eventually will. Maybe wordpress will create a powerful search for all those wordpress sites.
- arthurcolle 12y agoMaybe I'm beating a dead horse but I feel like you could create a pretty compelling search engine using ES. I used it this summer at Goldman and it seems like it will really change the landscape... It's just so fast. I mean full-text-indexing seems to be a pretty integral part of search. Maybe it's just the first step, with the second step being a well written ranking function, but that's just my thought.
- nemothekid 12y agoI think "full-text indexing" is a very different problem than "search." Full-text indexing (what ES provides) has been around for almost forever, ES just does a way better job of productizing/delivering it. However, Google is far more than a text index. Ranking, currently is still very difficult and requires messing around with facet and weighting parameters.
- Igglyboo 12y agoElastic is more like a quick way to search through huge amounts of text, not a way to rank which hits are more relevant.
- arthurcolle 12y agoIt lets you define your own ranking /scoring function I think