This article is slightly more helpful: http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-uber-lyft-20141209-story.html http://www.latimes.com/business/technol

This article is slightly more helpful: http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-uber-lyft-20141209-story.html http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-uber-lyf... It appears the lawsuit is mostly for "false advertising" and (as stated in the LA Times article) the damages are perhaps in the low dozens of millions. The complaint perhaps focuses on the background check system. I can't find a copy of the actual complaint, but looks like it's "business tort": (via http://www.sfsuperiorcourt.org/online-services/verify?f=cnq http://www.sfsuperiorcourt.org/online-services/verify?f=cnq ) Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco Case Number: CGC 14 543120 Title: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL Cause of Action: BUSINESS TORT IMO the Mercury News article spins the magnitude of this lawsuit a bit too hard. Yes, Uber will probably pay (once again) for its hubris, but it's mostly gonna be dirt off its shoulders ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7HAYkB-gH0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7HAYkB-gH0 ).