> Especially when the request was not worded as "we're trying to standardize this, want to help out", but "we ARE the standard, comply with us". Maybe I missed

> Especially when the request was not worded as "we're trying to standardize this, want to help out", but "we ARE the standard, comply with us". Maybe I missed it, but I never got the impression that CoreOS was as bullish as you say. If Docker wasn't moving in the direction of container standardization, then someone needed to step up and do it, and I'm glad CoreOS is doing so. The final container standard 1.0 might not be based on CoreOS's proposal at all, and hopefully it's more compatible with today's de facto Docker containers, but the important thing is that standardization is part of the conversation now.