3 ms·

This makes me wonder if eggs should be considered a health food instead of a health hazard. Anecdotal, but if I eat 4 eggs(~300) calories, I am full for the sam

This makes me wonder if eggs should be considered a health food instead of a health hazard. Anecdotal, but if I eat 4 eggs(~300) calories, I am full for the same period of time as eating ~600-1000 calories of something else. But considering the saturated fat and cholesterol in eggs, they have been considered harmful. Are they?

mindcrime 12y ago
But considering the saturated fat and cholesterol in eggs, they have been considered harmful. Are they? Good question. The author of Living Low Carb[1] argues that it's not "saturated fat" in general that's bad for you, but rather more specifically "trans-saturated fat", or saturated fat consumed along with simple carbs (sugar, etc). He also argues that most dietary cholesterol passes through your system unprocessed, and that serum cholesterol is largely driven by cholesterol manufactured by your liver. [1]: http://www.amazon.com/Living-Low-Carb-Controlled-Carbohydrate-Long-Term/dp/1454903511 http://www.amazon.com/Living-Low-Carb-Controlled-Carbohydrat...
- gmarx 12y ago
  yep. Manufactured by your liver, on purpose. Cholesterol is necessary for animals to live. It comprises,for example (if memory serves) about 50% of animal cell membrane. It's bizarre that people have been convinced this stuff is deadly poison. Same thing for sodium chloride
Evgeny 12y ago
But considering the saturated fat and cholesterol in eggs, they have been considered harmful. Are they? No, they are not. There's plenty written on both sides of the argument, though. Just today came across a surprisingly well-referenced article on nutrition myths. It covers cholesterol, saturated fat and eggs (in top position) among others. http://www.businessinsider.com/the-11-most-destructive-nutrition-lies-ever-told-2014-12 http://www.businessinsider.com/the-11-most-destructive-nutri... Here is another well-referenced source http://examine.com/faq/are-eggs-healthy.html http://examine.com/faq/are-eggs-healthy.html

mindcrime 12y ago

But considering the saturated fat and cholesterol in eggs, they have been considered harmful. Are they? Good question. The author of Living Low Carb[1] argues that it's not "saturated fat" in general that's bad for you, but rather more specifically "trans-saturated fat", or saturated fat consumed along with simple carbs (sugar, etc). He also argues that most dietary cholesterol passes through your system unprocessed, and that serum cholesterol is largely driven by cholesterol manufactured by your liver. [1]: http://www.amazon.com/Living-Low-Carb-Controlled-Carbohydrate-Long-Term/dp/1454903511 http://www.amazon.com/Living-Low-Carb-Controlled-Carbohydrat...

gmarx 12y ago
yep. Manufactured by your liver, on purpose. Cholesterol is necessary for animals to live. It comprises,for example (if memory serves) about 50% of animal cell membrane. It's bizarre that people have been convinced this stuff is deadly poison. Same thing for sodium chloride

Evgeny 12y ago

But considering the saturated fat and cholesterol in eggs, they have been considered harmful. Are they? No, they are not. There's plenty written on both sides of the argument, though. Just today came across a surprisingly well-referenced article on nutrition myths. It covers cholesterol, saturated fat and eggs (in top position) among others. http://www.businessinsider.com/the-11-most-destructive-nutrition-lies-ever-told-2014-12 http://www.businessinsider.com/the-11-most-destructive-nutri... Here is another well-referenced source http://examine.com/faq/are-eggs-healthy.html http://examine.com/faq/are-eggs-healthy.html