> "Enhanced interrogation technique" is an uncontroversial, accurate factual description. Such language exists only to obscure the meaning. How exactly do you

> "Enhanced interrogation technique" is an uncontroversial, accurate factual description. Such language exists only to obscure the meaning. How exactly do you distinguish an "enhanced" interrogation technique from merely an interrogation technique? Is there any better criterion than saying that an interrogation technique is "enchanced" if it involves torture? Orwell has a nice essay about this: https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm UPDATED: I can't reference Orwell and start sentences with "In my opinion..." :)