5 ms·
Why does MIT have to remove the video content? Lewin's lectures are one of the best sources to learn physics. Period.
by gamesbrainiac 12y ago
Why does MIT have to remove the video content? Lewin's lectures are one of the best sources to learn physics. Period.
- gravity13 12y agoThis is true. I actually cite his physics lectures as part of the reason why I got into the online learning tech industry. Walter Lewin's been a bit of a hero to me.
- henrikgs 12y agoAnyone seen both Lewin and Susskind[0] got any thoughts on the differences? I was thinking about starting on one of these. http://theoreticalminimum.com/courses/classical-mechanics/2011/fall http://theoreticalminimum.com/courses/classical-mechanics/20...
- anatoly 12y agoSusskind is much more advanced. Realistically speaking you need to understand and internalize the content of Lewin (or comparable) before you take on Susskind. Lewin = undergraduate-level physics Susskind = graduate-level physics, converted to minimize math and maximize accessible explanations, but still graduate-level physics.
- gamesbrainiac 12y agoI would agree with anatoly. Susskind is an amazing teacher, but sometimes its a bit tough for undergrads. I would highly recommend his Quantum mechanics lectures [0] too, which are very interesting. [0] https://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=189C0DCE90CB6D81 https://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=189C0DCE90CB6D81