For what it's worth, I think your comment did a better job of explaining what the author had to say than the author did. I wouldn't go as far as "incredibly bo

For what it's worth, I think your comment did a better job of explaining what the author had to say than the author did. I wouldn't go as far as "incredibly boring", but the article strikes me as having its priorities mixed up. Is trying to use Euripides to talk about society, or use society to talk about Euripides? Maybe the intention was the former, but I came away thinking "that sounds like a neat play" and not particularly closer to any insight on the nature of intoxication.