5 ms·
N is the smallest number without a wikipedia page. A page is created to document this fact. N+1 is now the smallest number without a wikipedia page. But if you
by ketralnis 12y ago
N is the smallest number without a wikipedia page. A page is created to document this fact. N+1 is now the smallest number without a wikipedia page.
But if you created the page for N, that was its only feature of notability. If you create a page for N+1, N is now no longer notable. But that means also means that N+1's page is both inaccurate and not notable, and so it must be deleted. N is now once again the smallest number without a wikipedia page.
So rather than creating an infinitely increasing set of pages, I think you end up toggling forever between N and N+1
- diego 12y agoI'm pretty sure being the smallest number without a Wikipedia page does not fit the Wikipedia notability criteria for an article, so the article for N would never be approved.
- throwaway_yy2Di 12y agoThis is how you lose editing privileges.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- throwaway_yy2Di 12y ago(...either 2551 or 7563, depending on if you allow things like "7562 Kagiroino-Oka")
- cyorir 12y agoI think N would retain a Wikipedia page. When you add a page for N+1, you update the page for N to include a history section: "N was the smallest number without a wikipedia page, until December 8, 2014, when N+1 became the smallest number without a wikipedia page."
- RogerL 12y agoThere is no particular reason to think that N+1 does not have a wikipedia page. The next page without a number might be, I dunno, N+3454327.
- ketralnis 12y agoThat's true, but doesn't actually change my logic at all