The claim is that "novel, non obvious, contain inventive step and useful" implies "interesting". My counter-claim is that the label "interesting" is only going

The claim is that "novel, non obvious, contain inventive step and useful" implies "interesting". My counter-claim is that the label "interesting" is only going to be true for a very few people. Perhaps even only the inventor. Even if only 100 of them "deserve" patent protection, how do you conclude that all of them will be interesting? And how many people do you think need to find it interesting? My underlying point is that patents are nothing to be in awe of. Just because it's patented doesn't mean it's interesting. I get the feeling that you want "interesting" to be a requirement of the patent office. If so, how do you define it?