4 ms·
Not unless we equivocate and redefine "almost all" to be something other than what he used in this video, right? He showed that the ratio of "whole numbers con
by jlebar 12y ago
Not unless we equivocate and redefine "almost all" to be something other than what he used in this video, right?
He showed that the ratio of "whole numbers containing 3" to "whole numbers" is close to 1. So the ratio of "whole numbers not containing three" to "whole numbers" is close to 0.