The Swedish IRS aren't making any claim. They just can't find any proof that the TPB has anything to do with the accused. And without proof, they don't. What?

The Swedish IRS aren't making any claim. They just can't find any proof that the TPB has anything to do with the accused. And without proof, they don't. What? That makes no sense what so ever. How does TPB's hypothetical revenue increase the chance that the accused own TPB?