3 ms·
Both matter. Execution doesn't progress without the capacity to think well. Learning to think well doesn't progress without littering and clearing the mind of t
by drcomputer 12y ago
Both matter. Execution doesn't progress without the capacity to think well. Learning to think well doesn't progress without littering and clearing the mind of thousands of ideas. It's a careful balance of maintaining a signal in the noise.
- bennyg 12y agoI agree to some extent. I think that given an equal idea across two executions, the better execution wins. And that's the take away.
- unclebucknasty 12y agoGiven an equal execution across two different ideas, wouldn't the better idea win?
- bennyg 12y agoToo many variables.
- kbutler 12y agoA less-valuable (worse) idea may be easier to execute successfully than a more valuable (better) idea.
- drcomputer 12y agoThe completion of executing the less valuable (as perceived) idea may lead to the ease in execution of the more valuable (as perceived) idea. It's more humorous to consider maths and programs as ideas. And when I say humorous, I mean that very seriously.
- unclebucknasty 12y agoOr not. But, going with that: Conversely, a better execution may be more difficult to implement successfully. My original point was that the G-GP's statement was self-evident to the point of meaninglessness. You could flip the bits the other way and say something equally as meaning-ful(less). Both idea and execution have some level of importance, but holding one constant while improving the other does nothing to discriminate between the relative value of either.