RMS seems to just not like CL, so I doubt that will happen. The big advantage of hosting Elisp on CL imo is that Elisp's semantics are a much better match for C

RMS seems to just not like CL, so I doubt that will happen. The big advantage of hosting Elisp on CL imo is that Elisp's semantics are a much better match for CL. For example it's trivial to do dynamic scope in CL, but not easily supported in Scheme (the linked TODO implies they've managed to get dynamic scope on top of Guile working, but with poor performance).