> Passing the buck to another open source library is irresponsible and, frankly, lazy. Did you read Steve's justification for the limitation? "This other libra

> Passing the buck to another open source library is irresponsible and, frankly, lazy. Did you read Steve's justification for the limitation? "This other library is infringing copyright" isn't passing the buck. > Perhaps the maintainer should burn out, and let someone take over the gem who'll commit to feature-completeness. There is a handy "fork" button on Github. Of course, entitled bitching is a lot cheaper than maintaining a library, emitting a pull request or spending precious bytes on a modicum of courtesy.