3 ms·
As maintainer of OS project I find this issue justified and constructive. It points to usability problem and how to fix it (documentation). And poster did his h
by qwerta 12y ago
As maintainer of OS project I find this issue justified and constructive. It points to usability problem and how to fix it (documentation). And poster did his homework by debugging script first. He enumerates missing chars (easy to unit tests!) and clearly spells reason (underlying library).
I would love to have such reports all the time!!!
- scarygliders 12y agoAs a creator and maintainer of OS projects, I have to disagree for the following reasons; 1) It is clear from the issue raised, that the creator of the issue did not do his homework. This means actually looking at the README file, and, seeing that the project "exposes the Phantom Open Emoji library unicode/image assets and APIs for working with them", proceed to the link to the Phantom Open Emoji library that the author took the time and trouble to provide a clickable link to , and read on from there. 2) Additionally, the creator of the issue then posted a link to an alternative project. Ergo, not only was the creator of the issue being lazy in the first place, he then tried to punish the author of the project for that laziness. If you really cannot see this, then I suggest looking again at the project's README, how it describes itself, clicking through to the Phantom Open Emoji library link provided, and reading the information there. Then re-think your opinion on this matter.