10 ms·
Well, that would be a lot of redundancy. Good isolation is hard to achieve (as proven by this post), why bother doing it twice? Is there any upside?
by xxxyy 12y ago
Well, that would be a lot of redundancy. Good isolation is hard to achieve (as proven by this post), why bother doing it twice? Is there any upside?
- Nitramp 12y agoDefense in depth. Have another failsafe if your first line of defense fails (as it will).
- nl 12y agoAppEngine (the PAAS) uses containerisation to isolate services. That both provides a security layer and allows resource control. This incident demonstrates the need for it. Additionally it isn't really redundant. AppEngine supports Python and Go as well as Java, and it makes sense to have a common isolation infrastructure.