I agree with the comparison sort of being apples to oranges, but the key point is it's bad to have the majority of CEO's pay be Stock+Options because that will

I agree with the comparison sort of being apples to oranges, but the key point is it's bad to have the majority of CEO's pay be Stock+Options because that will lead to: - The CEO will push the company to focus on SVM - The increase in wage gap due to high exec pay, like the 1%. - The company might not be helping it's longevity An alternative would be not to pay exec's with Stock+Options, but focus on Salary+Bonus.