3 ms·
Im all for questioning assumptions. But i dont see him put forward a clear alternative. And he is comparing change in stock prices based on corporate mantras.
by mooneater 12y ago
Im all for questioning assumptions. But i dont see him put forward a clear alternative.
And he is comparing change in stock prices based on corporate mantras. He doesnt even adjust for industry, or compare to the overall market during that time. That makes no sense, why is this #1.
- mkhalil 12y agoI agree with the comparison sort of being apples to oranges, but the key point is it's bad to have the majority of CEO's pay be Stock+Options because that will lead to: - The CEO will push the company to focus on SVM - The increase in wage gap due to high exec pay, like the 1%. - The company might not be helping it's longevity An alternative would be not to pay exec's with Stock+Options, but focus on Salary+Bonus.